FETH vs. FBCG
FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FETH is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past year, FETH returned -46.78% vs 24.47% for FBCG. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.
Performance
FETH vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -37.15% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 11.42% return.
FETH
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- 6M
- -19.58%
- YTD
- -37.15%
- 1Y
- -46.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.81%
FBCG
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 24.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.40%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.99M | $34.97M | $38.44M | |
| $29.41M | $29.69M | $35.01M |
FETH vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -37.15% | -11.37% | -4.68% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 11.42% | 18.60% | 9.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between FETH and FBCG is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FETH and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FETH vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank
FETH
FBCG
FETH vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FETH | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.21 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 1.62 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 5.52 | -6.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FETH vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and FBCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FETH | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.94% | -43.56% | -24.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.94% | -15.17% | -52.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.55% | -4.62% | -56.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.30% | -11.31% | -23.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.61% | 4.45% | +41.16% |
Volatility
FETH vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 6.68%. This indicates that FETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FETH | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.28% | 6.68% | +5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.60% | 16.57% | +29.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.10% | 20.68% | +46.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.16% | 26.11% | +45.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.16% | 25.74% | +45.42% |
FETH vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FETH vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison
FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FETH and FBCG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to FBCG (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -67.94% vs FBCG's -43.56%.
On 1-year performance, FBCG leads with 24.47% vs -46.78% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 24.47% return vs -46.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.
FBCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FETH and 0.59% for FBCG.
FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FETH and FBCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer