FETH vs. BTRN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - FETH tracks the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index while BTRN tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FETH returned -41.37% vs -25.19% for BTRN. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.

Performance

FETH vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -40.36% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -10.56% return.

FETH

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 6.51%
• 6M: -42.88%
• YTD: -40.36%
• 1Y: -41.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTRN

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: -10.80%
• YTD: -10.56%
• 1Y: -25.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FETH vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	-40.36%	-11.37%	-4.68%
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	-10.56%	4.89%	23.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FETH and BTRN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.58

The correlation between FETH and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FETH vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FETH

FETH Risk / Return Rank: 5
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

BTRN

BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 0
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FETH vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FETH	BTRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	-1.44	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	-1.97	+1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.73	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.61	-0.96	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.96	-1.50	+0.54

FETH vs. BTRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is higher than the BTRN Sharpe Ratio of -1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FETH and BTRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FETH vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and BTRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FETH	BTRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.94%	-36.97%	-30.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.94%	-26.45%	-41.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.51%	-26.34%	-37.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.52%	-14.90%	-19.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.12%	16.83%	+26.29%

Volatility

FETH vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a higher volatility of 16.12% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 1.74%. This indicates that FETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FETH	BTRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.12%	1.74%	+14.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.94%	10.25%	+36.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.30%	17.60%	+50.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.86%	30.28%	+41.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.86%	30.28%	+41.58%

FETH vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FETH vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison

FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	31.39%	27.76%	2.56%
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FETH and BTRN in my portfolio?

FETH and BTRN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FETH or BTRN?

FETH has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to BTRN (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -67.94% vs BTRN's -36.97%.

Which ETF is better, FETH or BTRN?

On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -25.19% vs -41.37% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FETH or BTRN?

Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -25.19% return vs -41.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FETH or BTRN?

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FETH or BTRN?

BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.39%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

What is the main difference between FETH and BTRN?

FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while BTRN tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FETH and 0.95% for BTRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.