FESM vs. SPSM
FESM (Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF) and SPSM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FESM is actively managed, while SPSM is passively managed. Over the past year, FESM returned 46.73% vs 31.50% for SPSM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FESM charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPSM.
Performance
FESM vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FESM achieves a 19.64% return, which is significantly higher than SPSM's 15.28% return.
FESM
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 19.64%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPSM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
FESM vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 19.64% | 17.88% | 16.22% | 12.19% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 15.28% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 12.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FESM and SPSM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FESM and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FESM vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FESM
SPSM
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
FESM
SPSM
Industrials
FESM
SPSM
Healthcare
FESM
SPSM
Financial Services
FESM
SPSM
Consumer Cyclical
FESM
SPSM
Energy
FESM
SPSM
Real Estate
FESM
SPSM
Basic Materials
FESM
SPSM
Communication Services
FESM
SPSM
Utilities
FESM
SPSM
Consumer Defensive
FESM
SPSM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FESM vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank
FESM
SPSM
FESM vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FESM | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | 3.63 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.60 | 12.14 | +4.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FESM | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.82 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.45 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
FESM vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FESM drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, smaller than the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESM and SPSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FESM | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.93% | -42.89% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -8.72% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -0.97% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -7.93% | +3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.60% | +0.22% |
Volatility
FESM vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) at 4.44%. This indicates that FESM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FESM | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 4.44% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 11.64% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 17.47% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 21.43% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 22.99% | -1.73% |
FESM vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FESM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FESM vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison
FESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SPSM's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FESM and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FESM has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to SPSM (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FESM dropped -26.93% vs SPSM's -42.89%.
On 1-year performance, FESM leads with 46.73% vs 31.50% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FESM has performed better with a 46.73% return vs 31.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for FESM.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.53% for FESM.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FESM and 0.05% for SPSM.
FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FESM and SPSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer