PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FESM vs. SPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FESM vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FESM achieves a 24.59% return, which is significantly higher than SPSM's 19.33% return.


FESM

1D
-0.78%
1M
4.79%
YTD
24.59%
6M
22.07%
1Y
51.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPSM

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.27%
YTD
19.33%
6M
16.91%
1Y
34.61%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
11.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FESM vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
24.59%17.88%16.22%12.09%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
19.33%6.11%8.55%12.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FESM and SPSM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023

0.95

The correlation between FESM and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FESM vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FESM
SPSM

Technology

23.3%
17.1%

Industrials

18.5%
15.2%

Healthcare

16.1%
11.0%

Financial Services

14.6%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
13.1%

Energy

5.9%
5.4%

Basic Materials

4.0%
5.0%

Real Estate

3.9%
7.6%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.7%

Utilities

1.8%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
3.6%

Technology

FESM
23.3%
SPSM
17.1%

Industrials

FESM
18.5%
SPSM
15.2%

Healthcare

FESM
16.1%
SPSM
11.0%

Financial Services

FESM
14.6%
SPSM
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FESM
7.7%
SPSM
13.1%

Energy

FESM
5.9%
SPSM
5.4%

Basic Materials

FESM
4.0%
SPSM
5.0%

Real Estate

FESM
3.9%
SPSM
7.6%

Communication Services

FESM
3.1%
SPSM
3.7%

Utilities

FESM
1.8%
SPSM
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FESM
1.1%
SPSM
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FESM vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FESM
FESM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FESM vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FESMSPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.10

3.99

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.36

13.45

+4.90

FESM vs. SPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FESM Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the SPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FESM and SPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FESM vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FESM drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, smaller than the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESM and SPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FESMSPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-42.89%

+15.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-8.72%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.41%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-7.89%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.58%

+0.24%

Volatility

FESM vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) at 4.93%. This indicates that FESM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FESMSPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

4.93%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

12.04%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.54%

17.65%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.32%

21.42%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

22.99%

-1.67%

FESM vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FESM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FESM vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison

FESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than SPSM's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
0.73%0.82%1.08%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.41%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FESM and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FESM has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to SPSM (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FESM dropped -26.93% vs SPSM's -42.89%.

On 1-year performance, FESM leads with 51.65% vs 34.61% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FESM has performed better with a 51.65% return vs 34.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for FESM.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.73% for FESM.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FESM and 0.03% for SPSM.

FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FESM and SPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer