PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ferrari Group PLC (FERGR.AS) and Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FERGR.AS is traded in EUR, while AAPL.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AAPL.NEO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERGR.AS achieves a -9.59% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL.NEO's 19.26% return.


FERGR.AS

1D
-1.25%
1M
5.40%
6M
-13.92%
YTD
-9.59%
1Y
-12.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.65%

AAPL.NEO

1D
-1.84%
1M
10.72%
6M
29.73%
YTD
19.26%
1Y
51.35%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FERGR.AS
Ferrari Group PLC
-9.59%9.58%
AAPL.NEO
Apple Inc CDR
19.26%4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FERGR.AS and AAPL.NEO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERGR.AS
FERGR.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FERGR.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERGR.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERGR.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FERGR.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERGR.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL.NEO
AAPL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AAPL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferrari Group PLC (FERGR.AS) and Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FERGR.ASAAPL.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.36

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

3.64

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.64

9.45

-10.09

FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERGR.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the AAPL.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERGR.AS and AAPL.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERGR.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.22%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL.NEO drawdown of -36.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERGR.AS and AAPL.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FERGR.ASAAPL.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.22%

-36.86%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.22%

-14.16%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.95%

-1.84%

-24.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.48%

-10.19%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.59%

5.45%

+13.14%

Volatility

FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ferrari Group PLC (FERGR.AS) is 8.35%, while Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that FERGR.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FERGR.ASAAPL.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

11.64%

-3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.49%

19.93%

+7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.20%

25.62%

+9.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.61%

28.15%

+8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.61%

28.15%

+8.46%

Dividends

FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FERGR.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than AAPL.NEO's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AAPL.NEO
Apple Inc CDR
0.32%0.38%1.99%3.32%4.65%0.81%
FERGR.AS
Ferrari Group PLC
4.18%2.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FERGR.AS vs. AAPL.NEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferrari Group PLC and Apple Inc CDR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. FERGR.AS values in EUR, AAPL.NEO values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


FERGR.AS and AAPL.NEO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FERGR.AS and AAPL.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer