PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AAPL.NEO is traded in CAD, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL.NEO achieves a 13.85% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -12.10% return.


AAPL.NEO

1D
0.48%
1M
8.14%
YTD
13.85%
6M
10.83%
1Y
52.65%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-2.45%
1M
3.12%
YTD
-12.10%
6M
-12.61%
1Y
-8.46%
3Y*
9.95%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
25.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AAPL.NEO
Apple Inc CDR
13.85%6.55%29.10%47.14%-27.57%19.47%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-12.10%10.28%22.63%54.71%-22.90%12.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL.NEO and MSFT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between AAPL.NEO and MSFT has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAPL.NEO:

CA$651.80B

MSFT:

$3.10T

EPS

AAPL.NEO:

CA$7.56

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

AAPL.NEO:

5.84

MSFT:

24.82

PS Ratio

AAPL.NEO:

1.57

MSFT:

9.76

PB Ratio

AAPL.NEO:

8.84

MSFT:

7.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAPL.NEO:

CA$416.16B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAPL.NEO:

CA$195.20B

MSFT:

$217.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL.NEO
AAPL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AAPL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPL.NEOMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.96

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

-0.25

+3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

-0.50

+9.36

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL.NEO and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPL.NEOMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

-0.34

+2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.90

-0.34

Drawdowns

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFT drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL.NEO and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPL.NEOMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.25%

-34.17%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.27%

-34.17%

+19.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.25%

-34.17%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-22.69%

+21.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-7.54%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

16.80%

-11.06%

Volatility

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO) is 5.40%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that AAPL.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPL.NEOMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

10.16%

-4.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.08%

22.25%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.25%

25.10%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.95%

25.48%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.95%

25.96%

+1.99%

Dividends

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

AAPL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than MSFT's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL.NEO
Apple Inc CDR
0.46%0.53%0.54%0.67%0.91%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.85%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc CDR and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
102.47B
82.89B
(AAPL.NEO) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AAPL.NEO values in CAD, MSFT values in USD

AAPL.NEO vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apple Inc CDR and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
47.2%
67.6%
Portfolio components
AAPL.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc CDR reported a gross profit of 48.34B and revenue of 102.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

AAPL.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc CDR reported an operating income of 32.43B and revenue of 102.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

AAPL.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc CDR reported a net income of 27.47B and revenue of 102.47B, resulting in a net margin of 26.8%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL.NEO and MSFT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL.NEO and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer