AAPL.NEO vs. AAPL.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO) and Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO).

Performance

AAPL.NEO vs. AAPL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO) and Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AAPL.NEO vs. AAPL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AAPL.NEO Apple Inc CDR	-6.32%	6.55%	29.10%	47.14%	-27.57%	19.47%
AAPL.TO Apple CDR (CAD Hedged)	-6.24%	6.36%	29.57%	46.85%	-27.69%	19.43%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AAPL.NEO having a -6.32% return and AAPL.TO slightly higher at -6.24%.

AAPL.NEO

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -3.84%
• YTD: -6.32%
• 6M: -0.78%
• 1Y: 12.83%
• 3Y*: 14.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPL.TO

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -3.73%
• YTD: -6.24%
• 6M: -0.74%
• 1Y: 12.77%
• 3Y*: 14.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AAPL.NEO vs. AAPL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL.NEO

AAPL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 53
AAPL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AAPL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AAPL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
AAPL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

AAPL.TO

AAPL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 53
AAPL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AAPL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
AAPL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
AAPL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL.NEO vs. AAPL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO) and Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAPL.NEO	AAPL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	0.40	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	0.83	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.12	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	0.59	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.75	1.74	+0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAPL.NEO vs. AAPL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the AAPL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL.NEO and AAPL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAPL.NEO	AAPL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	0.40	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.40	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL.NEO and AAPL.TO is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AAPL.NEO vs. AAPL.TO - Dividend Comparison

AAPL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than AAPL.TO's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AAPL.NEO Apple Inc CDR	0.57%	0.53%	0.54%	0.67%	0.91%	0.15%
AAPL.TO Apple CDR (CAD Hedged)	0.41%	0.38%	0.85%	0.49%	0.70%	0.12%

Drawdowns

AAPL.NEO vs. AAPL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL.TO drawdown of -33.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL.NEO and AAPL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPL.NEO	AAPL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.25%	-33.28%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.58%	-22.58%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.14%	-11.07%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.75%	-9.80%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.64%	7.65%	-0.01%

Volatility

AAPL.NEO vs. AAPL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc CDR (AAPL.NEO) and Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) have volatilities of 5.78% and 5.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPL.NEO	AAPL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	5.80%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.14%	16.22%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.88%	31.90%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.11%	28.15%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.11%	28.15%	-0.04%

Financials