PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FERGR.AS vs. IMID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FERGR.AS vs. IMID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ferrari Group PLC (FERGR.AS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FERGR.AS vs. IMID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FERGR.AS
Ferrari Group PLC
-8.42%5.28%
IMID.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI
-96.07%3.95%
Different Trading Currencies

FERGR.AS is traded in EUR, while IMID.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IMID.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERGR.AS achieves a -8.42% return, which is significantly higher than IMID.L's -96.07% return.


FERGR.AS

1D
5.68%
1M
-18.58%
YTD
-8.42%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IMID.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
-5.70%
YTD
-96.07%
6M
-95.94%
1Y
-95.50%
3Y*
-61.21%
5Y*
-42.66%
10Y*
-16.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FERGR.AS vs. IMID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERGR.AS
FERGR.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FERGR.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERGR.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERGR.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FERGR.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERGR.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IMID.L
IMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
IMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERGR.AS vs. IMID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferrari Group PLC (FERGR.AS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FERGR.ASIMID.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

-0.98

+1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

-0.85

+1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.50

+0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

-0.99

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.81

-3.03

+4.83

FERGR.AS vs. IMID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERGR.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the IMID.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERGR.AS and IMID.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FERGR.ASIMID.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

-0.98

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

-0.33

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between FERGR.AS and IMID.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FERGR.AS vs. IMID.L - Dividend Comparison

FERGR.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, while IMID.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025
FERGR.AS
Ferrari Group PLC
3.78%3.46%
IMID.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI
0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FERGR.AS vs. IMID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERGR.AS drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum IMID.L drawdown of -96.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERGR.AS and IMID.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FERGR.ASIMID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.03%

-96.32%

+67.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.03%

-96.32%

+67.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.00%

-96.30%

+71.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-12.26%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.91%

31.52%

-21.61%

Volatility

FERGR.AS vs. IMID.L - Volatility Comparison

Ferrari Group PLC (FERGR.AS) has a higher volatility of 13.86% compared to SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that FERGR.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FERGR.ASIMID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.86%

3.74%

+10.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.77%

322.66%

-297.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.32%

96.91%

-60.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.39%

44.86%

-8.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.39%

35.78%

+0.61%