PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FERG.L vs. PUK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FERG.L vs. PUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ferguson plc (FERG.L) and Prudential plc (PUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FERG.L is traded in GBp, while PUK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PUK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERG.L achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than PUK's -16.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FERG.L has outperformed PUK with an annualized return of 19.30%, while PUK has yielded a comparatively lower 0.91% annualized return.


FERG.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
-9.50%
YTD
2.75%
6M
-8.91%
1Y
9.40%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
19.30%

PUK

1D
-1.76%
1M
-19.74%
YTD
-16.17%
6M
-11.03%
1Y
12.62%
3Y*
-4.03%
5Y*
-5.63%
10Y*
0.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERG.L vs. PUK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FERG.L
Ferguson plc
2.75%21.48%-6.33%47.31%-18.06%52.40%34.01%40.23%-3.68%9.76%
PUK
Prudential plc
-16.17%85.14%-26.08%-21.18%-9.50%0.90%-3.49%23.08%-24.20%19.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FERG.L and PUK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007

0.35

The correlation between FERG.L and PUK shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FERG.L:

£33.00B

PUK:

$32.88B

EPS

FERG.L:

£10.56

PUK:

$4.25

PE Ratio

FERG.L:

16.04

PUK:

5.99

PEG Ratio

FERG.L:

1.45

PUK:

0.14

PS Ratio

FERG.L:

1.05

PUK:

0.98

PB Ratio

FERG.L:

5.63

PUK:

2.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

FERG.L:

£31.60B

PUK:

$33.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FERG.L:

£9.61B

PUK:

$20.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

FERG.L:

£3.07B

PUK:

$15.89B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FERG.L vs. PUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERG.L
FERG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FERG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FERG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PUK
PUK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUK Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUK Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERG.L vs. PUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferguson plc (FERG.L) and Prudential plc (PUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FERG.LPUKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.11

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

0.60

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

2.30

-1.01

FERG.L vs. PUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is comparable to the PUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERG.L and PUK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FERG.LPUKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

0.49

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

-0.18

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.03

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.13

+0.07

Drawdowns

FERG.L vs. PUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERG.L drawdown since its inception was -93.08%, which is greater than PUK's maximum drawdown of -73.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERG.L and PUK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FERG.LPUKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.08%

-73.67%

-19.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.14%

-21.30%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.85%

-46.35%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.38%

-59.38%

+25.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-59.38%

+13.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.33%

-32.60%

+19.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.75%

-19.19%

-22.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.06%

5.51%

+1.55%

Volatility

FERG.L vs. PUK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ferguson plc (FERG.L) is 7.36%, while Prudential plc (PUK) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that FERG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FERG.LPUKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

11.01%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.61%

21.44%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.97%

25.70%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.37%

32.09%

-5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

34.22%

-7.38%

Dividends

FERG.L vs. PUK - Dividend Comparison

FERG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than PUK's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FERG.L
Ferguson plc
1.90%1.52%1.81%1.58%2.73%2.33%2.50%2.34%8.57%2.06%2.02%2.46%
PUK
Prudential plc
2.09%1.54%2.64%1.72%1.28%4.60%1.70%17.06%3.71%2.33%3.50%2.62%

Financials

FERG.L vs. PUK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferguson plc and Prudential plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
7.45B
11.35B
(FERG.L) Total Revenue
(PUK) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FERG.L values in GBp, PUK values in USD

FERG.L vs. PUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ferguson plc and Prudential plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
29.7%
100.0%
Portfolio components
FERG.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a gross profit of 2.22B and revenue of 7.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

PUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prudential plc reported a gross profit of 11.35B and revenue of 11.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

FERG.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported an operating income of 612.43M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

PUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prudential plc reported an operating income of 2.39B and revenue of 11.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

FERG.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a net income of 412.94M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

PUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prudential plc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 11.35B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FERG.L and PUK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FERG.L and PUK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer