PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FERG.L vs. GSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FERG.L vs. GSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ferguson plc (FERG.L) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FERG.L is traded in GBp, while GSL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GSL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERG.L achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than GSL's 13.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FERG.L has outperformed GSL with an annualized return of 19.30%, while GSL has yielded a comparatively lower 17.07% annualized return.


FERG.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
-9.50%
YTD
2.75%
6M
-8.91%
1Y
9.40%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
19.30%

GSL

1D
1.19%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
13.41%
6M
8.67%
1Y
63.75%
3Y*
33.05%
5Y*
29.56%
10Y*
17.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERG.L vs. GSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FERG.L
Ferguson plc
2.75%21.48%-6.33%47.31%-18.06%52.40%34.01%40.23%-3.68%9.76%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
13.41%61.11%20.16%22.53%-12.91%102.25%30.70%71.25%-43.38%-29.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FERG.L and GSL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2008

0.16

The correlation between FERG.L and GSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FERG.L:

£33.00B

GSL:

$1.40B

EPS

FERG.L:

£10.56

GSL:

$10.76

PE Ratio

FERG.L:

16.04

GSL:

3.54

PEG Ratio

FERG.L:

1.45

GSL:

0.13

PS Ratio

FERG.L:

1.05

GSL:

1.78

PB Ratio

FERG.L:

5.63

GSL:

0.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

FERG.L:

£31.60B

GSL:

$770.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FERG.L:

£9.61B

GSL:

$409.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

FERG.L:

£3.07B

GSL:

$528.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FERG.L vs. GSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERG.L
FERG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FERG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FERG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GSL
GSL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERG.L vs. GSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferguson plc (FERG.L) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FERG.LGSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.38

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

4.04

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

12.21

-10.92

FERG.L vs. GSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the GSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERG.L and GSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FERG.LGSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

2.38

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.81

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.32

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.04

+0.15

Drawdowns

FERG.L vs. GSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERG.L drawdown since its inception was -93.08%, roughly equal to the maximum GSL drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERG.L and GSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FERG.LGSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.08%

-93.29%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.14%

-15.86%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.85%

-36.25%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.38%

-42.58%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-85.38%

+39.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.33%

-6.43%

-6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.75%

-53.10%

+11.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.06%

5.24%

+1.82%

Volatility

FERG.L vs. GSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ferguson plc (FERG.L) is 7.36%, while Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that FERG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FERG.LGSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

9.11%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.61%

19.66%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.97%

26.94%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.37%

36.75%

-10.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

54.32%

-27.48%

Dividends

FERG.L vs. GSL - Dividend Comparison

FERG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than GSL's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FERG.L
Ferguson plc
1.90%1.52%1.81%1.58%2.73%2.33%2.50%2.34%8.57%2.06%2.02%2.46%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
6.29%6.06%7.56%7.57%8.26%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.69%

Financials

FERG.L vs. GSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferguson plc and Global Ship Lease, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
7.45B
198.08M
(FERG.L) Total Revenue
(GSL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FERG.L values in GBp, GSL values in USD

FERG.L vs. GSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ferguson plc and Global Ship Lease, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
29.7%
53.7%
Portfolio components
FERG.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a gross profit of 2.22B and revenue of 7.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

GSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.27M and revenue of 198.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.

FERG.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported an operating income of 612.43M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

GSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.42M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

FERG.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a net income of 412.94M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

GSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a net income of 93.83M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in a net margin of 47.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FERG.L and GSL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FERG.L and GSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer