PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEQT.NEO achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC.TO's -26.46% return.


FEQT.NEO

1D
0.54%
1M
4.10%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.77%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC.TO

1D
-2.74%
1M
-20.46%
YTD
-26.46%
6M
-32.03%
1Y
-38.60%
3Y*
35.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
10.90%19.42%14.08%
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-26.46%-10.85%54.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and FBTC.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEQT.NEOFBTC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.86

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

-0.77

+3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

-1.32

+14.85

FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQT.NEO and FBTC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEQT.NEOFBTC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

-0.90

+3.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

0.07

+1.72

Drawdowns

FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum FBTC.TO drawdown of -70.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQT.NEO and FBTC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEQT.NEOFBTC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-70.77%

+57.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-50.22%

+41.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-49.79%

+49.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-30.95%

+29.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

29.35%

-27.44%

Volatility

FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) is 3.90%, while Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) has a volatility of 9.51%. This indicates that FEQT.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEQT.NEOFBTC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

9.51%

-5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

33.11%

-24.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

42.86%

-31.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.44%

52.36%

-39.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.44%

52.36%

-39.92%

FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQT.NEO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. FBTC.TO - Dividend Comparison

FEQT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while FBTC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
0.82%0.91%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEQT.NEO and FBTC.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FBTC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBTC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

FEQT.NEO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while FBTC.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FEQT.NEO and 0.40% for FBTC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEQT.NEO and FBTC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer