FEMSX vs. PEAFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX).
FEMSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 9, 2008. PEAFX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 5, 2015.
Performance
FEMSX vs. PEAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEMSX vs. PEAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 5.44% | 37.92% | 7.84% | 14.23% | -23.95% | -5.14% | 24.72% | 28.87% | -16.20% | 49.92% |
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 7.99% | 20.25% | 1.14% | 22.28% | -10.71% | 15.47% | 6.43% | 13.30% | -12.77% | 28.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMSX achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than PEAFX's 7.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMSX has outperformed PEAFX with an annualized return of 10.88%, while PEAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.
FEMSX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 38.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
PEAFX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEMSX vs. PEAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PEAFX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEMSX vs. PEAFX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMSX
PEAFX
FEMSX vs. PEAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMSX | PEAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.08 | 1.70 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.13 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.33 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 1.97 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 7.72 | +3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMSX | PEAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.70 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.55 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.60 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.66 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMSX and PEAFX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FEMSX vs. PEAFX - Dividend Comparison
FEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than PEAFX's 2.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 2.32% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 2.39% | 12.83% | 2.99% | 2.48% | 9.42% | 8.98% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 2.75% | 2.97% | 1.01% | 4.01% | 11.33% | 9.19% | 7.05% | 2.48% | 11.05% | 8.07% | 2.59% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FEMSX vs. PEAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMSX drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum PEAFX drawdown of -47.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMSX and PEAFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMSX | PEAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.16% | -47.18% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -12.14% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.64% | -28.57% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.16% | -47.18% | +3.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.35% | -8.13% | -2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -10.29% | -3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.10% | +0.30% |
Volatility
FEMSX vs. PEAFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) has a higher volatility of 10.41% compared to PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) at 5.86%. This indicates that FEMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEMSX | PEAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.41% | 5.86% | +4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 11.22% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 15.52% | +3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 14.90% | +3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 17.24% | +1.89% |