PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMSX vs. FAMKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEMSX having a 33.67% return and FAMKX slightly lower at 33.58%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEMSX having a 13.44% annualized return and FAMKX not far behind at 12.97%.


FEMSX

1D
1.45%
1M
10.61%
YTD
33.67%
6M
37.91%
1Y
67.03%
3Y*
28.65%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
13.44%

FAMKX

1D
2.02%
1M
13.68%
YTD
33.58%
6M
37.50%
1Y
69.96%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEMSX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
33.67%37.92%7.84%14.23%-23.95%-5.14%24.72%28.87%-16.20%49.92%
FAMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A
33.58%39.76%9.01%8.12%-20.09%-2.90%30.05%29.29%-18.32%46.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMSX and FAMKX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2008

0.97

The correlation between FEMSX and FAMKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMSX vs. FAMKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMSX
FEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMKX
FAMKX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FAMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEMSXFAMKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.72

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

5.13

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.16

20.90

-0.74

FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.58, which is comparable to the FAMKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMSX and FAMKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMSXFAMKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58

3.91

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.50

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.69

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.45

+0.12

Drawdowns

FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMSX drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum FAMKX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMSX and FAMKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMSXFAMKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.16%

-70.11%

+25.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-13.73%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

-18.84%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.64%

-40.76%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.16%

-42.16%

-2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

-20.46%

+7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.36%

0.00%

Volatility

FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) have volatilities of 7.96% and 7.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMSXFAMKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

7.88%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.40%

15.44%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.95%

18.00%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

18.92%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.34%

18.82%

+0.52%

FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMKX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Dividend Comparison

FEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FAMKX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A
1.00%1.33%0.74%1.25%0.76%4.87%1.84%10.64%0.17%0.10%0.03%0.00%
FEMSX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
1.83%2.45%2.08%2.82%2.39%12.83%2.99%2.48%9.42%8.98%1.46%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FEMSX and FAMKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEMSX has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to FAMKX (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMSX dropped -44.16% vs FAMKX's -70.11%.

FAMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 3.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMSX and FAMKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer