FEMSX vs. FAMKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX).
FEMSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 9, 2008. FAMKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 29, 2004.
Performance
FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 1.83% | 37.92% | 7.84% | 14.23% | -23.95% | -5.14% | 24.72% | 28.87% | -16.20% | 49.92% |
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 0.85% | 39.76% | 9.01% | 8.12% | -20.09% | -2.90% | 30.05% | 29.29% | -18.32% | 46.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMSX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than FAMKX's 0.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEMSX having a 10.49% annualized return and FAMKX not far behind at 10.07%.
FEMSX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -12.51%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 34.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
FAMKX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -13.15%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 32.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMKX's 1.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEMSX vs. FAMKX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMSX
FAMKX
FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMSX | FAMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 1.74 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 2.22 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.13 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 8.25 | +1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMSX | FAMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.74 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.24 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.54 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.39 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMSX and FAMKX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Dividend Comparison
FEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than FAMKX's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 2.39% | 12.83% | 2.99% | 2.48% | 9.42% | 8.98% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 1.32% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.76% | 4.87% | 1.84% | 10.64% | 0.17% | 0.10% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMSX drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum FAMKX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMSX and FAMKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMSX | FAMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.16% | -70.11% | +25.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -13.73% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.64% | -40.76% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.16% | -42.16% | -2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.42% | -13.73% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -20.60% | +7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.55% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FEMSX vs. FAMKX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) at 8.51%. This indicates that FEMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEMSX | FAMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 8.51% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 13.09% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 18.40% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 18.46% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 18.56% | +0.54% |