FEMKX vs. FNMIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEMKX (Fidelity Emerging Markets) and FNMIX (Fidelity New Markets Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FEMKX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FNMIX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FEMKX returned 12.37%/yr vs 4.04%/yr for FNMIX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMKX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FNMIX.

Performance

FEMKX vs. FNMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMKX achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than FNMIX's 3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMKX has outperformed FNMIX with an annualized return of 12.37%, while FNMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.04% annualized return.

FEMKX

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 9.75%
• YTD: 28.21%
• 6M: 30.66%
• 1Y: 58.46%
• 3Y*: 23.78%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 12.37%

FNMIX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 15.89%
• 3Y*: 12.95%
• 5Y*: 3.87%
• 10Y*: 4.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMKX vs. FNMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets	28.21%	31.02%	7.12%	15.16%	-27.48%	1.25%	32.56%	33.67%	-18.03%	46.92%
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	3.96%	14.86%	6.80%	14.00%	-16.09%	-2.42%	4.62%	10.93%	-7.77%	10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMKX and FNMIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 1993	0.45

The correlation between FEMKX and FNMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FEMKX vs. FNMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMKX

FEMKX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FEMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FEMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FEMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FEMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FEMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FNMIX

FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMKX vs. FNMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEMKX	FNMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	3.73	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	6.25	-2.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.81	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.51	4.29	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.09	18.79	-1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEMKX vs. FNMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMKX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the FNMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMKX and FNMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEMKX	FNMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	3.73	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.59	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.58	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.80	-0.47

Drawdowns

FEMKX vs. FNMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMKX drawdown since its inception was -71.14%, which is greater than FNMIX's maximum drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMKX and FNMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMKX	FNMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.14%	-42.76%	-28.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.00%	-3.85%	-9.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.13%	-6.42%	-12.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.88%	-27.16%	-13.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.24%	-27.16%	-16.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.95%	-5.69%	-20.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	0.88%	+2.55%

Volatility

FEMKX vs. FNMIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) at 1.60%. This indicates that FEMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMKX	FNMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	1.60%	+6.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.07%	3.59%	+12.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.92%	4.44%	+14.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.90%	6.62%	+12.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	6.93%	+11.75%

FEMKX vs. FNMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMKX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FNMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMKX vs. FNMIX - Dividend Comparison

FEMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FNMIX's 4.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets	0.04%	0.05%	0.65%	1.11%	0.77%	6.00%	1.39%	1.71%	0.83%	0.08%	0.67%	0.51%
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	4.88%	5.07%	4.71%	5.15%	3.93%	3.48%	4.06%	4.87%	4.98%	5.77%	6.93%	4.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMKX and FNMIX in my portfolio?

FEMKX and FNMIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEMKX or FNMIX?

FEMKX has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to FNMIX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMKX dropped -71.14% vs FNMIX's -42.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.