FEMG vs. IPO
FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) and IPO (Renaissance IPO ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. FEMG is actively managed, while IPO is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMG charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for IPO.
Performance
FEMG vs. IPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEMG
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPO
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 13.25%
- YTD
- 24.62%
- 6M
- 22.81%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
FEMG vs. IPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 4.23% |
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 17.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMG and IPO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.78 |
FEMG vs. IPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEMG
IPO
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
FEMG
IPO
Technology
FEMG
IPO
Consumer Cyclical
FEMG
IPO
Healthcare
FEMG
IPO
Financial Services
FEMG
IPO
Energy
FEMG
IPO
Utilities
FEMG
IPO
Communication Services
FEMG
IPO
Real Estate
FEMG
IPO
Consumer Defensive
FEMG
IPO
Basic Materials
FEMG
IPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMG vs. IPO — Risk / Return Rank
FEMG
IPO
FEMG vs. IPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMG | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.78 | 0.31 | +4.48 |
Drawdowns
FEMG vs. IPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum IPO drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and IPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMG | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -68.76% | +65.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -24.70% | +23.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -22.93% | +21.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.67% | — |
Volatility
FEMG vs. IPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMG | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 28.91% | -16.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 35.85% | -23.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 31.50% | -19.21% |
FEMG vs. IPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than IPO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMG vs. IPO - Dividend Comparison
FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 0.46% | 0.66% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMG and IPO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.
IPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.60% for IPO.
Find the right allocation for FEMG and IPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer