FEMG vs. FCUS
FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) and FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMG charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FCUS.
Performance
FEMG vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEMG
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCUS
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 40.06%
- 6M
- 36.58%
- 1Y
- 80.88%
- 3Y*
- 33.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMG vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 9.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMG and FCUS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2026 | 0.36 |
FEMG vs. FCUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEMG
FCUS
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
FEMG
FCUS
Technology
FEMG
FCUS
Consumer Cyclical
FEMG
FCUS
Healthcare
FEMG
FCUS
Financial Services
FEMG
FCUS
-
Energy
FEMG
FCUS
Utilities
FEMG
FCUS
-
Communication Services
FEMG
FCUS
Consumer Defensive
FEMG
FCUS
Real Estate
FEMG
FCUS
-
Basic Materials
FEMG
FCUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMG vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank
FEMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCUS
FEMG vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEMG | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEMG vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and FCUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMG | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -39.89% | +35.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -6.67% | +4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -7.51% | +6.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.13% | — |
Volatility
FEMG vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMG | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 35.71% | -19.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 30.34% | -13.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 30.34% | -13.80% |
FEMG vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMG vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison
FEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FCUS's 3.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 3.09% | 4.33% | 11.19% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMG and FCUS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.
FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.10% for FEMG.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Pinnacle. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.79% for FCUS.
Find the right allocation for FEMG and FCUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer