FEMD vs. RDIV
FEMD (First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. FEMD is actively managed, while RDIV is passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.
Performance
FEMD vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEMD
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 14.32%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 28.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
FEMD vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FEMD First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF | 7.15% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMD and RDIV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMD vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank
FEMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDIV
FEMD vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF (FEMD) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEMD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEMD vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMD drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMD and RDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -49.97% | +38.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -2.08% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -5.84% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.70% | — |
Volatility
FEMD vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 13.41% | +7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 17.48% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 21.88% | -1.10% |
FEMD vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMD vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison
FEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMD First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.71% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMD and RDIV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FEMD.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.00% for FEMD.
They also come from different issuers: First Eagle and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FEMD and 0.39% for RDIV.
Find the right allocation for FEMD and RDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer