FEMB vs. YCS
FEMB (First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - FEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). FEMB is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEMB returned 1.90%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for YCS. Their -0.25 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FEMB charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
FEMB vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMB has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 1.90%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.
FEMB
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.09%
YCS
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 25.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.81M | $3.29M | $2.60M | |
| $1.53M | $2.43M | $1.42M |
FEMB vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 2.20% | 21.77% | -5.61% | 17.12% | -10.50% | -13.40% | 3.16% | 11.52% | -7.19% | 11.92% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.29% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMB and YCS is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2014 | -0.25 |
The correlation between FEMB and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (1 year) to -0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMB vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
FEMB
YCS
FEMB vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEMB | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 2.35 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 8.93 | -5.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEMB vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMB | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.44% | -49.56% | +19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -8.30% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.13% | -23.05% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -27.32% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.44% | -27.32% | -3.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -5.68% | +3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -19.75% | +9.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.64% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FEMB vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) is 1.79%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that FEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMB | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 5.30% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 11.65% | -4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.20% | 16.85% | -8.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 21.16% | -10.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 18.61% | -7.95% |
FEMB vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMB vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.19% | 5.67% | 6.09% | 5.15% | 6.35% | 6.12% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 5.86% | 6.38% | 5.83% | 4.89% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMB and YCS have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to FEMB (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMB dropped -30.44% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.76% vs 1.90% for FEMB. On fees, FEMB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 1.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEMB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
FEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.19%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
FEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FEMB and 1.00% for YCS.
FEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEMB and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer