PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMB vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMB vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 30.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMB has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 2.51%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.34% annualized return.


FEMB

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.88%
1Y
10.20%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
2.51%

TDIV

1D
-1.79%
1M
15.82%
YTD
30.57%
6M
28.79%
1Y
53.63%
3Y*
33.27%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
19.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMB vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
0.60%21.77%-5.61%17.12%-10.50%-13.40%3.16%11.52%-7.19%11.92%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
30.57%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMB and TDIV is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2014

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMB vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMB
FEMB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMB vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEMBTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.49

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

5.02

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.34

15.64

-11.30

FEMB vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMB and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEMBTDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

2.93

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.94

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.93

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.88

-0.79

Drawdowns

FEMB vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, roughly equal to the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMBTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.44%

-31.97%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-10.74%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.13%

-23.00%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.85%

-31.97%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

-31.97%

+1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-1.79%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-4.84%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.44%

-1.09%

Volatility

FEMB vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) is 3.05%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that FEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMBTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

6.86%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.57%

13.91%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.36%

18.47%

-10.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.26%

20.67%

-10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.99%

20.85%

-9.86%

FEMB vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMB vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than TDIV's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
6.06%5.67%6.09%5.15%6.35%6.12%5.29%5.40%5.86%6.38%5.83%4.89%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.12%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMB and TDIV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FEMB (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMB dropped -30.44% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 19.34% vs 2.51% for FEMB. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FEMB has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FEMB.

FEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 1.12% for TDIV.

FEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FEMB and 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMB and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer