PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMB vs. JPIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMB vs. JPIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly higher than JPIB's 0.67% return.


FEMB

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.67%
6M
-0.39%
YTD
2.20%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
1.90%
ALL TIME*
1.09%

JPIB

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.83%
6M
-0.25%
YTD
0.67%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.81M$3.29M$2.60M
$7.79M$8.91M$9.60M

FEMB vs. JPIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
2.20%21.77%-5.61%17.12%-10.50%-13.40%3.16%11.52%-7.19%1.87%
JPIB
JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF
0.67%8.19%3.48%8.68%-6.38%0.14%7.14%10.76%-2.17%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMB and JPIB is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017

0.37

Over the past year, FEMB and JPIB have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMB vs. JPIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEMB
FEMB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

JPIB
JPIB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JPIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPIB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
JPIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPIB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEMB vs. JPIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMBJPIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

0.97

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.90

3.18

+0.73

FEMB vs. JPIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the JPIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMB and JPIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMB vs. JPIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, which is greater than JPIB's maximum drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and JPIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMBJPIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.44%

-13.13%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-3.75%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.13%

-3.75%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-11.83%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-1.19%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-1.91%

-7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.14%

+1.48%

Volatility

FEMB vs. JPIB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) at 0.74%. This indicates that FEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMBJPIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

0.74%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

3.14%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.20%

3.58%

+4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.23%

4.13%

+6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

4.42%

+6.24%

FEMB vs. JPIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JPIB's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMB vs. JPIB - Dividend Comparison

FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than JPIB's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
6.19%5.67%6.09%5.15%6.35%6.12%5.29%5.40%5.86%6.38%5.83%4.89%
JPIB
JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF
4.58%4.85%4.57%4.35%3.10%2.59%3.14%4.66%5.83%1.81%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMB and JPIB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEMB has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to JPIB (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMB dropped -30.44% vs JPIB's -13.13%.

On 5-year performance, FEMB leads with 2.76% vs 2.70% for JPIB. On fees, JPIB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JPIB has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FEMB has performed better with a 2.76% return vs 2.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPIB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FEMB.

FEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.19%, compared with 4.58% for JPIB.

FEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while JPIB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FEMB and 0.50% for JPIB.

FEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMB and JPIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer