FELV vs. SCHD
FELV (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FELV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. FELV is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past year, FELV returned 29.77% vs 27.16% for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FELV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FELV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELV achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
FELV
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 29.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
FELV vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF | 14.72% | 15.80% | 15.89% | 7.19% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 7.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELV and SCHD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FELV and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FELV vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FELV
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
FELV
SCHD
Financial Services
FELV
SCHD
Industrials
FELV
SCHD
Healthcare
FELV
SCHD
Communication Services
FELV
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FELV
SCHD
Energy
FELV
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FELV
SCHD
Basic Materials
FELV
SCHD
Utilities
FELV
SCHD
Real Estate
FELV
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELV vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FELV
SCHD
FELV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.45 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 5.91 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.85 | 14.53 | +4.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 2.49 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.65 | 0.86 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
FELV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELV drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELV and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.08% | -33.37% | +17.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.85% | -4.61% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.40% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -3.32% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.88% | -0.30% |
Volatility
FELV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.66% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 7.66% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.72% | 10.96% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 14.38% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 16.72% | -3.32% |
FELV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FELV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF | 1.51% | 1.67% | 2.02% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FELV and SCHD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FELV has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELV dropped -16.08% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 1-year performance, FELV leads with 29.77% vs 27.16% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FELV has performed better with a 29.77% return vs 27.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELV.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.51% for FELV.
FELV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELV and 0.06% for SCHD.
FELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELV and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer