FELV vs. FBCG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG).

FELV and FBCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FELV is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 20, 2023. FBCG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020.

Performance

FELV vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FELV vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	1.19%	15.80%	15.89%	7.19%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	-8.61%	18.60%	39.05%	4.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELV achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's -8.61% return.

FELV

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: -4.75%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 5.03%
• 1Y: 15.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: 4.81%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -8.61%
• 6M: -6.56%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELV vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

FBCG

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF

FELV

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF

Return for Risk

FELV vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELV

FELV Risk / Return Rank: 61
FELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FELV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FELV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 64
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELV vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FELV	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	0.97	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	1.54	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	1.65	-0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.73	5.92	+0.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FELV vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELV Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELV and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FELV	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	0.97	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	0.67	+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between FELV and FBCG is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FELV vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than FBCG's 0.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	1.71%	1.67%	2.02%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Drawdowns

FELV vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELV drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELV and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELV	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.08%	-43.56%	+27.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-15.17%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.75%	-11.09%	+6.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-11.79%	+9.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	4.23%	-1.75%

Volatility

FELV vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) is 4.43%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that FELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELV	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	8.22%	-3.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.28%	14.74%	-6.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.18%	26.28%	-10.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.58%	25.82%	-12.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.58%	25.92%	-12.34%