FELG vs. QARP
FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FELG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while QARP is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. FELG is actively managed, while QARP is passively managed. Over the past year, FELG returned 16.43% vs 26.93% for QARP. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FELG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
FELG vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELG achieves a 4.21% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 14.12% return.
FELG
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.87%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 26.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.74M | $13.52M | $19.60M | |
| $114.19K | $118.59K | $179.68K |
FELG vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | 4.21% | 18.44% | 35.45% | 4.37% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 14.12% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 5.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELG and QARP is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FELG and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
FELG vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FELG
QARP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
FELG
QARP
Communication Services
FELG
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
FELG
QARP
Industrials
FELG
QARP
Healthcare
FELG
QARP
Financial Services
FELG
QARP
Utilities
FELG
QARP
Consumer Defensive
FELG
QARP
Energy
FELG
QARP
Basic Materials
FELG
QARP
Real Estate
FELG
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELG vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
FELG
QARP
FELG vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FELG | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.46 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 3.73 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.17 | 16.67 | -13.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FELG vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELG drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELG and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELG | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.89% | -35.44% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -7.26% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | 0.00% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.62% | -4.37% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 1.62% | +3.58% |
Volatility
FELG vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.64%. This indicates that FELG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELG | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 2.64% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | 8.20% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 10.68% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 15.53% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 19.51% | +0.53% |
FELG vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FELG vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
FELG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than QARP's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.44% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.01% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FELG and QARP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FELG has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to QARP (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELG dropped -23.89% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 1-year performance, QARP leads with 26.93% vs 16.43% for FELG. On fees, FELG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QARP has performed better with a 26.93% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FELG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.36% for FELG.
FELG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QARP is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELG and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELG and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer