PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDGX vs. PZIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDGX vs. PZIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDGX achieves a 19.51% return, which is significantly higher than PZIEX's 17.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDGX has underperformed PZIEX with an annualized return of 9.86%, while PZIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.


FEDGX

1D
0.64%
1M
1.42%
YTD
19.51%
6M
21.42%
1Y
39.27%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
9.86%

PZIEX

1D
1.07%
1M
3.10%
YTD
17.08%
6M
18.53%
1Y
44.08%
3Y*
22.80%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDGX vs. PZIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C
19.51%30.50%-4.59%19.45%-12.76%5.51%15.73%18.27%-19.70%35.93%
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
17.08%35.49%4.54%20.73%-5.67%6.65%8.43%13.57%-10.23%29.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDGX and PZIEX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.72

The correlation between FEDGX and PZIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDGX vs. PZIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDGX
FEDGX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FEDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PZIEX
PZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDGX vs. PZIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEDGXPZIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.55

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

3.53

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.78

11.84

+3.93

FEDGX vs. PZIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the PZIEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDGX and PZIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEDGXPZIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

3.03

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.79

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.83

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.63

-0.12

Drawdowns

FEDGX vs. PZIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDGX drawdown since its inception was -44.26%, roughly equal to the maximum PZIEX drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDGX and PZIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDGXPZIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.26%

-44.59%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-12.79%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-16.40%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.29%

-25.38%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.26%

-44.59%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-2.29%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-9.58%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

3.80%

-1.28%

Volatility

FEDGX vs. PZIEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDGXPZIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

4.49%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

12.72%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

14.89%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

14.74%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

15.37%

+0.36%

FEDGX vs. PZIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDGX has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PZIEX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDGX vs. PZIEX - Dividend Comparison

FEDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than PZIEX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEDGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C
3.18%3.81%3.01%1.09%0.57%10.88%0.00%0.00%0.49%1.54%0.58%0.00%
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
4.10%4.81%7.38%5.79%2.08%2.79%1.28%6.32%1.28%1.41%0.98%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDGX and PZIEX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZIEX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to FEDGX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDGX dropped -44.26% vs PZIEX's -44.59%.

PZIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDGX and PZIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer