PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDGX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDGX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDGX achieves a 18.76% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDGX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.


FEDGX

1D
0.36%
1M
1.33%
YTD
18.76%
6M
20.72%
1Y
38.81%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
9.80%

FCNTX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.72%
YTD
8.01%
6M
10.12%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
27.03%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDGX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C
18.76%30.50%-4.59%19.45%-12.76%5.51%15.73%18.27%-19.70%35.93%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
8.01%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDGX and FCNTX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2011

0.58

The correlation between FEDGX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDGX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDGX
FEDGX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FEDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDGX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEDGXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.03

1.83

+1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.89

2.54

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.33

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

2.26

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.19

9.62

+5.57

FEDGX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDGX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEDGXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

1.83

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.79

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.89

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.78

-0.27

Drawdowns

FEDGX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDGX drawdown since its inception was -44.26%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDGX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDGXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.26%

-49.19%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-11.30%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-19.75%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.29%

-32.59%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.26%

-32.59%

-11.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-0.30%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-8.16%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.65%

-0.13%

Volatility

FEDGX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.24%. This indicates that FEDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDGXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

3.24%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

10.48%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

14.06%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

19.15%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

19.68%

-3.95%

FEDGX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDGX has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDGX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FEDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than FCNTX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.32%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FEDGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C
3.20%3.81%3.01%1.09%0.57%10.88%0.00%0.00%0.49%1.54%0.58%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDGX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEDGX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to FCNTX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDGX dropped -44.26% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FEDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDGX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer