FEDGX vs. MAGS
FEDGX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both funds - FEDGX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, FEDGX returned 17.52%/yr vs 34.19%/yr for MAGS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEDGX charges 2.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
FEDGX vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDGX achieves a 18.76% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 4.87% return.
FEDGX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 18.76%
- 6M
- 20.72%
- 1Y
- 38.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
MAGS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- 1Y
- 33.10%
- 3Y*
- 34.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEDGX vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDGX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C | 18.76% | 30.50% | -4.59% | 12.13% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 4.87% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 37.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEDGX and MAGS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEDGX vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
FEDGX
MAGS
FEDGX vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEDGX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.03 | 1.66 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.89 | 2.26 | +1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.28 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 1.83 | +2.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.19 | 6.35 | +8.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEDGX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | 1.66 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.57 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
FEDGX vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDGX drawdown since its inception was -44.26%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDGX and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEDGX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.26% | -29.91% | -14.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -18.62% | +8.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.77% | -29.91% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -2.50% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -4.70% | -4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 5.37% | -2.85% |
Volatility
FEDGX vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) is 4.34%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that FEDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEDGX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 4.63% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 14.26% | -3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 20.05% | -6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 25.95% | -11.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 25.95% | -10.22% |
FEDGX vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDGX has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEDGX vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
FEDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than MAGS's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDGX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C | 3.20% | 3.81% | 3.01% | 1.09% | 0.57% | 10.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 1.54% | 0.58% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.41% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEDGX and MAGS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FEDGX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDGX dropped -44.26% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
FEDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEDGX and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer