PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDF.L achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than 3USL.L's 22.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDF.L has underperformed 3USL.L with an annualized return of 2.32%, while 3USL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.42% annualized return.


FEDF.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.35%
6M
1.88%
YTD
1.97%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
2.32%

3USL.L

1D
0.64%
1M
-1.12%
6M
21.60%
YTD
22.59%
1Y
53.10%
3Y*
42.60%
5Y*
19.75%
10Y*
27.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDF.L
Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc
1.97%4.26%5.24%5.10%1.60%-0.03%0.28%2.13%1.74%0.93%
3USL.L
WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB
22.59%28.97%63.99%70.50%-57.35%101.78%7.90%97.95%-26.23%66.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDF.L and 3USL.L is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDF.L
FEDF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

3USL.L
3USL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
3USL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3USL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
3USL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
3USL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
3USL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDF.L3USL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.35

1.25

+2.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

30.12

2.09

+28.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

178.09

7.85

+170.24

FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.27, which is higher than the 3USL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDF.L and 3USL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDF.L drawdown since its inception was -0.28%, smaller than the maximum 3USL.L drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDF.L and 3USL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDF.L3USL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-76.72%

+76.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-25.29%

+25.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.13%

-48.69%

+48.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

-63.46%

+63.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.28%

-76.72%

+76.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.82%

+3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-14.68%

+14.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

6.75%

-6.73%

Volatility

FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) is 0.11%, while WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that FEDF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDF.L3USL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

8.83%

-8.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.35%

27.74%

-27.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54%

35.86%

-35.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.43%

47.63%

-47.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.35%

48.40%

-48.05%

FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDF.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than 3USL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDF.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEDF.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDF.L and 3USL.L have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEDF.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEDF.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.

FEDF.L is categorized as Money Market, while 3USL.L is Leveraged Equities. FEDF.L tracks Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index, while 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for FEDF.L and 0.75% for 3USL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDF.L and 3USL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer