PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDF.L achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 20.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDF.L has underperformed ANXU.L with an annualized return of 2.27%, while ANXU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.87% annualized return.


FEDF.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
2.27%

ANXU.L

1D
0.47%
1M
10.48%
YTD
20.59%
6M
20.82%
1Y
44.18%
3Y*
28.75%
5Y*
18.29%
10Y*
21.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDF.L
Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc
1.47%4.25%5.24%5.10%1.60%-0.03%0.28%2.13%1.74%0.93%
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
20.59%19.86%26.74%56.50%-33.24%27.83%47.17%40.88%-1.76%32.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDF.L and ANXU.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2015

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDF.L
FEDF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEDF.LANXU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.93

2.76

+4.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

13.57

3.77

+9.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.13

1.47

+1.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

29.74

3.83

+25.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

172.34

13.70

+158.65

FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.93, which is higher than the ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDF.L and ANXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEDF.LANXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93

2.76

+4.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

8.29

0.89

+7.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

6.58

1.18

+5.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.28

1.20

+5.08

Drawdowns

FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDF.L drawdown since its inception was -0.28%, smaller than the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -35.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDF.L and ANXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDF.LANXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-35.13%

+34.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-11.01%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.13%

-22.45%

+22.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

-35.13%

+35.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.28%

-35.13%

+34.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-5.78%

+5.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

3.08%

-3.06%

Volatility

FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) is 0.11%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that FEDF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDF.LANXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

5.03%

-4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

11.90%

-11.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56%

15.94%

-15.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.42%

20.80%

-20.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.35%

21.16%

-20.81%

FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDF.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEDF.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEDF.L nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDF.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEDF.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEDF.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXU.L.

FEDF.L is categorized as Money Market, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. FEDF.L tracks Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for FEDF.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDF.L and ANXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer