FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FEDF.L (Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc) and ACWL.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEDF.L is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index, while ACWL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEDF.L returned 2.27%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for ACWL.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEDF.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACWL.L.

Performance

FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FEDF.L is traded in USD, while ACWL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ACWL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDF.L achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than ACWL.L's 12.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDF.L has underperformed ACWL.L with an annualized return of 2.27%, while ACWL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.

FEDF.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: 3.52%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

ACWL.L

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 5.57%
• YTD: 12.85%
• 6M: 14.22%
• 1Y: 31.01%
• 3Y*: 22.10%
• 5Y*: 11.31%
• 10Y*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEDF.L Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc	1.47%	4.25%	5.24%	5.10%	1.60%	-0.03%	0.28%	2.13%	1.74%	0.93%
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	12.85%	21.83%	19.36%	17.72%	-16.89%	20.41%	14.43%	19.77%	-1.48%	19.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDF.L and ACWL.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2015	0.04

Return for Risk

FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDF.L

FEDF.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FEDF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FEDF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FEDF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FEDF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

ACWL.L

ACWL.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ACWL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ACWL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ACWL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ACWL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEDF.L	ACWL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	6.93	2.71	+4.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	13.57	3.89	+9.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.13	1.49	+1.64
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.74	3.16	+26.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	172.34	14.38	+157.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDF.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.93, which is higher than the ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDF.L and ACWL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEDF.L	ACWL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.93	2.71	+4.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	8.29	1.30	+6.99
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	6.58	2.01	+4.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.28	1.81	+4.47

Drawdowns

FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDF.L drawdown since its inception was -0.28%, smaller than the maximum ACWL.L drawdown of -25.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDF.L and ACWL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEDF.L	ACWL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-25.82%	+25.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.13%	-9.55%	+9.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.13%	-17.33%	+17.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.13%	-25.82%	+25.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-0.28%	-25.82%	+25.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-2.79%	+2.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	2.10%	-2.08%

Volatility

FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF Acc (FEDF.L) is 0.11%, while Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that FEDF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEDF.L	ACWL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	3.33%	-3.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.36%	8.74%	-8.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56%	11.39%	-10.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.42%	21.93%	-21.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.35%	28.25%	-27.90%

FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDF.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEDF.L vs. ACWL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEDF.L nor ACWL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEDF.L and ACWL.L in my portfolio?

FEDF.L and ACWL.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FEDF.L or ACWL.L?

On fees, FEDF.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEDF.L or ACWL.L?

FEDF.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWL.L.

What is the main difference between FEDF.L and ACWL.L?

FEDF.L is categorized as Money Market, while ACWL.L is Global Equities. FEDF.L tracks Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index, while ACWL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for FEDF.L and 0.45% for ACWL.L.