PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDCX vs. FNMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDCX vs. FNMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FEDCX at 4.03% and FNMIX at 4.03%. Over the past 10 years, FEDCX has outperformed FNMIX with an annualized return of 4.31%, while FNMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.96% annualized return.


FEDCX

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.78%
YTD
4.03%
6M
4.63%
1Y
15.07%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
4.31%

FNMIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.71%
YTD
4.03%
6M
4.52%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
3.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDCX vs. FNMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDCX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund
4.03%14.91%7.39%11.92%-16.08%-1.28%4.78%10.50%-4.55%10.59%
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
4.03%14.86%6.80%14.00%-16.09%-2.42%4.62%10.93%-7.77%10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDCX and FNMIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2011

0.96

The correlation between FEDCX and FNMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDCX vs. FNMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDCX
FEDCX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FEDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FNMIX
FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDCX vs. FNMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) and Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDCXFNMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.74

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

4.03

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.97

17.58

-0.60

FEDCX vs. FNMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is comparable to the FNMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDCX and FNMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDCX vs. FNMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDCX drawdown since its inception was -26.00%, smaller than the maximum FNMIX drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDCX and FNMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDCXFNMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-42.76%

+16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-3.85%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.42%

-6.42%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-27.16%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.00%

-27.16%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.50%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-5.68%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.88%

+0.03%

Volatility

FEDCX vs. FNMIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) at 1.25%. This indicates that FEDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDCXFNMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.25%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

3.65%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.69%

4.47%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

6.63%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.62%

6.92%

-0.30%

FEDCX vs. FNMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FNMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDCX vs. FNMIX - Dividend Comparison

FEDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than FNMIX's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEDCX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.82%5.97%5.18%5.55%3.84%3.81%4.99%5.89%6.08%7.33%7.03%5.61%
FNMIX
Fidelity New Markets Income Fund
4.88%5.07%4.71%5.15%3.93%3.48%4.06%4.87%4.98%5.77%6.93%4.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FEDCX and FNMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEDCX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to FNMIX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDCX dropped -26.00% vs FNMIX's -42.76%.

FNMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 3.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDCX and FNMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer