FEATX vs. TRCLX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FEATX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M) and TRCLX (T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - FEATX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while TRCLX is a China Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, FEATX returned 7.28%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for TRCLX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FEATX charges 1.45%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for TRCLX.

Performance

FEATX vs. TRCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEATX achieves a 23.29% return, which is significantly higher than TRCLX's 18.94% return.

FEATX

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: -6.71%
• 6M: 13.07%
• YTD: 23.29%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 26.66%
• 5Y*: 7.28%
• 10Y*: 13.45%
• ALL TIME*: 9.52%

TRCLX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -11.88%
• 6M: 8.51%
• YTD: 18.94%
• 1Y: 42.58%
• 3Y*: 15.02%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FEATX vs. TRCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	23.29%	36.34%	20.32%	13.22%	-30.99%	-15.29%	72.05%	6.38%
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund	18.94%	36.23%	10.95%	-15.51%	-26.24%	6.28%	59.73%	6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FEATX and TRCLX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2019	0.76

The correlation between FEATX and TRCLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FEATX vs. TRCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEATX

FEATX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FEATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FEATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FEATX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FEATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FEATX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

TRCLX

TRCLX Risk / Return Rank: 69
TRCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
TRCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TRCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TRCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
TRCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEATX vs. TRCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEATX	TRCLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.72	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.25	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.30	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	2.30	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.12	8.66	-0.54

FEATX vs. TRCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEATX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the TRCLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEATX and TRCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEATX vs. TRCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEATX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, which is greater than TRCLX's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEATX and TRCLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEATX	TRCLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.97%	-50.67%	-10.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.62%	-17.36%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.43%	-24.20%	+6.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.88%	-47.71%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.71%	-16.27%	+3.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.60%	-22.36%	+1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.80%	4.61%	+0.19%

Volatility

FEATX vs. TRCLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) is 9.96%, while T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) has a volatility of 11.25%. This indicates that FEATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEATX	TRCLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.96%	11.25%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.06%	19.96%	+3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.40%	23.19%	+2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.76%	23.68%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	23.85%	-2.34%

FEATX vs. TRCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEATX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TRCLX's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEATX vs. TRCLX - Dividend Comparison

FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.43%	6.70%	5.07%	6.24%	0.03%	0.89%	0.87%
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund	1.37%	1.64%	1.78%	2.56%	2.76%	8.23%	1.50%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEATX and TRCLX in my portfolio?

FEATX and TRCLX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEATX or TRCLX?

TRCLX has higher volatility (11.25%) compared to FEATX (9.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEATX dropped -60.97% vs TRCLX's -50.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.