PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEATX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEATX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEATX achieves a 39.88% return, which is significantly higher than FZROX's 12.01% return.


FEATX

1D
1.88%
1M
12.48%
YTD
39.88%
6M
45.14%
1Y
75.17%
3Y*
34.64%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
15.80%

FZROX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.79%
YTD
12.01%
6M
11.92%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEATX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FEATX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M
39.88%36.34%20.32%13.22%-30.99%-15.29%72.05%30.26%-6.75%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
12.01%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FEATX and FZROX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.65

The correlation between FEATX and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEATX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEATX
FEATX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FEATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEATX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FEATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEATX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEATX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEATXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.45

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.60

3.39

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.29

15.66

+4.63

FEATX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEATX Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEATX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEATXFZROXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

2.47

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.77

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.73

-0.25

Drawdowns

FEATX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEATX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEATX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEATXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.97%

-34.96%

-26.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.58%

-8.89%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-19.38%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.63%

-25.12%

-28.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.68%

-5.51%

-15.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

1.92%

+1.82%

Volatility

FEATX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 2.99%. This indicates that FEATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEATXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

2.99%

+5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

9.22%

+7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.83%

12.22%

+7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.91%

17.44%

+5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

20.13%

+0.85%

FEATX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEATX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEATX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FZROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEATX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.43%6.70%5.07%6.24%0.03%0.89%0.87%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.91%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEATX and FZROX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEATX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to FZROX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEATX dropped -60.97% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FEATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEATX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer