PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAM vs. JBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FEAM vs. JBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAM achieves a -42.62% return, which is significantly lower than JBL's 66.32% return.


FEAM

1D
-5.91%
1M
3.55%
YTD
-42.62%
6M
-56.03%
1Y
-60.23%
3Y*
-71.96%
5Y*
10Y*

JBL

1D
1.58%
1M
11.25%
YTD
66.32%
6M
77.18%
1Y
119.40%
3Y*
60.49%
5Y*
46.13%
10Y*
35.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAM vs. JBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc
-42.62%-79.28%-54.61%-82.11%-76.13%
JBL
Jabil Inc.
66.32%58.73%13.25%87.43%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAM and JBL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2022

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FEAM:

$61.10M

JBL:

$40.78B

EPS

FEAM:

-$1.76

JBL:

$7.47

PB Ratio

FEAM:

0.84

JBL:

30.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

FEAM:

$0.00

JBL:

$32.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FEAM:

-$10.56M

JBL:

$2.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

FEAM:

-$22.23M

JBL:

$1.55B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAM vs. JBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAM
FEAM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

JBL
JBL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAM vs. JBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEAMJBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.43

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

6.72

-7.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

17.46

-18.63

FEAM vs. JBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the JBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAM and JBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEAMJBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

2.91

-3.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

0.37

-1.07

Drawdowns

FEAM vs. JBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAM drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than JBL's maximum drawdown of -94.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAM and JBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEAMJBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.84%

-94.92%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.66%

-17.86%

-64.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.85%

-36.83%

-62.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.77%

-0.32%

-99.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.37%

-44.53%

-41.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.23%

6.86%

+44.37%

Volatility

FEAM vs. JBL - Volatility Comparison

5E Advanced Materials Inc (FEAM) has a higher volatility of 35.53% compared to Jabil Inc. (JBL) at 16.39%. This indicates that FEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEAMJBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.53%

16.39%

+19.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.61%

31.73%

+40.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.39%

41.30%

+72.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.54%

37.69%

+71.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.54%

37.06%

+72.48%

Dividends

FEAM vs. JBL - Dividend Comparison

FEAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEAM
5E Advanced Materials Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JBL
Jabil Inc.
0.08%0.14%0.22%0.25%0.47%0.45%0.75%0.77%1.29%1.22%1.35%1.37%

Financials

FEAM vs. JBL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 5E Advanced Materials Inc and Jabil Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B202220232024202520260
8.28B
(FEAM) Total Revenue
(JBL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FEAM and JBL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEAM has higher volatility (35.53%) compared to JBL (16.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAM dropped -99.84% vs JBL's -94.92%.

JBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAM and JBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer