FEAC vs. IUS
FEAC (Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FEAC is actively managed, while IUS is passively managed. Over the past year, FEAC returned 30.36% vs 33.27% for IUS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEAC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.
Performance
FEAC vs. IUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.71% return.
FEAC
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 6.25%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 30.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 33.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- —
FEAC vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 12.42% | 18.01% | -1.69% |
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 15.71% | 16.94% | -3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAC and IUS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FEAC and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAC vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank
FEAC
IUS
FEAC vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAC | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.44 | 3.26 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 4.53 | -1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.60 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 5.44 | -1.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.36 | 23.27 | -6.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAC | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 3.26 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.85 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
FEAC vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and IUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAC | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -34.67% | +15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -6.15% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.07% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -3.86% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.43% | +0.43% |
Volatility
FEAC vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.50%. This indicates that FEAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAC | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 2.50% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 7.41% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 10.26% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 15.00% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 18.04% | -0.54% |
FEAC vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FEAC vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison
FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than IUS's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 0.85% | 0.94% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEAC and IUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEAC has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to IUS (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs IUS's -34.67%.
On 1-year performance, IUS leads with 33.27% vs 30.36% for FEAC. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IUS has performed better with a 33.27% return vs 30.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.
IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.85% for FEAC.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.19% for IUS.
IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEAC and IUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer