FEAC vs. FELG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FEAC (Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) and FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEAC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FELG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEAC returned 26.41% vs 20.00% for FELG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

FEAC vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than FELG's 2.26% return.

FEAC

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 9.92%
• 6M: 8.83%
• 1Y: 26.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FELG

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAC vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF	9.92%	18.01%	-1.87%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	2.26%	18.44%	2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and FELG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024	0.91

The correlation between FEAC and FELG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEAC vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAC

FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 68
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 32
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAC vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAC	FELG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.24	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	1.73	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.22	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	1.24	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	4.14	+9.50

FEAC vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and FELG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum FELG drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and FELG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAC	FELG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.96%	-23.89%	+4.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.15%	-16.17%	+8.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.75%	-6.32%	+3.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.54%	-3.54%	+1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	4.84%	-2.90%

Volatility

FEAC vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) is 5.35%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that FEAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAC	FELG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.35%	6.15%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	12.66%	-2.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.30%	16.29%	-2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	20.00%	-2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	20.00%	-2.36%

FEAC vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FEAC and FELG have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FEAC vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than FELG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF	0.79%	0.94%	0.12%	0.00%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAC and FELG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FEAC and FELG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEAC or FELG?

FELG has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to FEAC (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs FELG's -23.89%.

Which ETF is better, FEAC or FELG?

On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 26.41% vs 20.00% for FELG. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, FEAC has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEAC or FELG?

Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 26.41% return vs 20.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEAC or FELG?

FEAC and FELG have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEAC or FELG?

FEAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.36% for FELG.

What is the main difference between FEAC and FELG?

FEAC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FELG is Large Cap Growth Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.