FEAAX vs. FHKAX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FEAAX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A) and FHKAX (Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - FEAAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FHKAX is a China Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX returned 15.08%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for FHKAX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEAAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for FHKAX.

Performance

FEAAX vs. FHKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEAAX having a 33.87% return and FHKAX slightly lower at 32.90%. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX has outperformed FHKAX with an annualized return of 15.08%, while FHKAX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.94% annualized return.

FEAAX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.97%
• 6M: 25.69%
• YTD: 33.87%
• 1Y: 56.72%
• 3Y*: 32.21%
• 5Y*: 7.69%
• 10Y*: 15.08%

FHKAX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: 22.83%
• YTD: 32.90%
• 1Y: 64.63%
• 3Y*: 31.35%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: 13.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAAX vs. FHKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	33.87%	36.67%	20.63%	13.50%	-30.79%	-15.06%	72.51%	30.64%	-15.11%	45.96%
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A	32.90%	42.19%	22.84%	-0.60%	-24.09%	-13.95%	47.37%	34.71%	-17.67%	51.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAAX and FHKAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2008	0.92

The correlation between FEAAX and FHKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEAAX vs. FHKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAAX

FEAAX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FEAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FEAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FEAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FEAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FEAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FHKAX

FHKAX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FHKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FHKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FHKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FHKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FHKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAAX vs. FHKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAAX	FHKAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.74	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.30	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.46	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.21	6.01	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.87	17.21	-3.35

FEAAX vs. FHKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FHKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAAX and FHKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAAX vs. FHKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAAX drawdown since its inception was -60.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FHKAX drawdown of -58.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAAX and FHKAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAAX	FHKAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.87%	-58.62%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.56%	-10.83%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.33%	-22.15%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.64%	-50.88%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.90%	-58.62%	+0.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.34%	-4.89%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.15%	-18.90%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	3.77%	+0.33%

Volatility

FEAAX vs. FHKAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) at 10.05%. This indicates that FEAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAAX	FHKAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.36%	10.05%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.53%	19.79%	+1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.91%	23.79%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.63%	24.66%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.34%	22.54%	-1.20%

FEAAX vs. FHKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FHKAX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAAX vs. FHKAX - Dividend Comparison

FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.88%	6.62%	5.21%	6.49%	0.03%	1.10%	0.84%
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A	1.20%	1.59%	1.22%	1.58%	0.59%	10.80%	4.71%	0.38%	0.39%	0.21%	0.99%	15.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAAX and FHKAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FEAAX and FHKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEAAX or FHKAX?

FEAAX has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to FHKAX (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAAX dropped -60.87% vs FHKAX's -58.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.