FDVV vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FDVV tracks the Fidelity Core Dividend Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVV returned 13.36%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

FDVV vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return.

FDVV

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 4.44%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 6M: 8.67%
• 1Y: 23.45%
• 3Y*: 20.08%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: —

SPTM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 27.84%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	8.39%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.10%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-17.75%	28.58%	17.94%	31.34%	-5.30%	21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and SPTM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016	0.88

The correlation between FDVV and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDVV vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDVV	SPTM
Technology	29.1%	34.0%
Financial Services	17.0%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.6%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	11.0%	4.8%
Real Estate	10.1%	2.3%
Utilities	8.7%	2.3%
Communication Services	3.7%	10.5%
Industrials	3.4%	9.4%
Healthcare	3.1%	8.6%
Basic Materials	-	2.0%
Energy	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

FDVV vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 64
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDVV	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.36	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.23	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.43	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	3.22	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	15.01	-4.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDVV vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDVV	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.36	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.80	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.46	+0.34

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDVV	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.25%	-54.80%	+14.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.30%	-8.68%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.90%	-18.87%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.18%	-24.14%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-0.67%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-9.05%	+5.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	1.86%	+0.37%

Volatility

FDVV vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 2.88%. This indicates that FDVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDVV	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	2.88%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	8.92%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.06%	11.88%	-1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	16.87%	-2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	18.03%	-1.03%

FDVV vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDVV vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than SPTM's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.72%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDVV and SPTM in my portfolio?

FDVV and SPTM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDVV or SPTM?

FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

Which ETF is better, FDVV or SPTM?

On 5-year performance, SPTM leads with 13.38% vs 13.36% for FDVV. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDVV or SPTM?

Over the 5-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 13.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDVV or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDVV or SPTM?

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.04% for SPTM.

What is the main difference between FDVV and SPTM?

FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.03% for SPTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.