PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDVLX vs. FFLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDVLX vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVLX achieves a 17.78% return, which is significantly higher than FFLC's 9.36% return.


FDVLX

1D
2.66%
1M
3.44%
YTD
17.78%
6M
16.76%
1Y
33.26%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
14.15%

FFLC

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
9.36%
6M
10.43%
1Y
24.11%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVLX vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
17.78%11.32%30.11%19.57%-9.07%35.30%33.29%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
9.36%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%19.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVLX and FFLC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.84

The correlation between FDVLX and FFLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDVLX vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVLX
FDVLX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLC
FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVLX vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDVLXFFLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.43

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.37

10.83

+1.53

FDVLX vs. FFLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVLX and FFLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDVLX vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVLX drawdown since its inception was -66.91%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVLX and FFLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDVLXFFLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.91%

-19.72%

-47.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-9.98%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.45%

-19.72%

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

-19.72%

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.62%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-2.98%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.24%

+0.46%

Volatility

FDVLX vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) at 4.66%. This indicates that FDVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDVLXFFLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

4.66%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.00%

10.43%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

13.32%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.60%

16.99%

+9.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.20%

17.67%

+7.53%

FDVLX vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVLX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDVLX vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than FFLC's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
8.53%10.05%33.05%3.71%7.08%9.79%0.98%3.34%16.25%3.38%1.26%10.97%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
1.00%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDVLX and FFLC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDVLX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to FFLC (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVLX dropped -66.91% vs FFLC's -19.72%.

FDVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVLX and FFLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer