FDV vs. IGPT
FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while IGPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index. FDV is actively managed, while IGPT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.69, they often move in opposite directions. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IGPT.
Performance
FDV vs. IGPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDV
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGPT
- 1D
- -7.04%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 68.99%
- 6M
- 69.36%
- 1Y
- 115.70%
- 3Y*
- 42.39%
- 5Y*
- 14.53%
- 10Y*
- 22.51%
FDV vs. IGPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.36% |
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and IGPT is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026 | -0.69 |
FDV vs. IGPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDV
IGPT
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
FDV
IGPT
Utilities
FDV
IGPT
-
Healthcare
FDV
IGPT
Consumer Defensive
FDV
IGPT
-
Technology
FDV
IGPT
Real Estate
FDV
IGPT
Energy
FDV
IGPT
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDV
IGPT
-
Industrials
FDV
IGPT
Communication Services
FDV
IGPT
Basic Materials
FDV
IGPT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. IGPT — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGPT
FDV vs. IGPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDV | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.56 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 25.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDV vs. IGPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum IGPT drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and IGPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -50.14% | +46.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -7.04% | +5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -11.94% | +10.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility
FDV vs. IGPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 33.13% | -20.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 28.71% | -16.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 26.86% | -14.41% |
FDV vs. IGPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IGPT's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDV vs. IGPT - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than IGPT's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 6.21% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDV and IGPT have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IGPT.
FDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.01% for IGPT.
FDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IGPT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.56% for IGPT.
Find the right allocation for FDV and IGPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer