FDV vs. FLTW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while FLTW is a Taiwan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. FDV is actively managed, while FLTW is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.69, they often move in opposite directions. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLTW.

Performance

FDV vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FDV

• 1D: 2.46%
• 1M: 3.59%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTW

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: -5.11%
• 6M: 48.76%
• YTD: 58.54%
• 1Y: 83.25%
• 3Y*: 37.32%
• 5Y*: 19.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDV vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	4.86%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FDV and FLTW is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026	-0.69

FDV vs. FLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDV	FLTW
Financial Services	15.7%	11.2%
Utilities	15.1%	-
Healthcare	12.8%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	12.3%	0.7%
Technology	10.7%	78.7%
Real Estate	9.7%	-
Energy	9.3%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	1.5%
Industrials	3.1%	3.3%
Communication Services	2.0%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.7%	2.5%

Return for Risk

FDV vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLTW

FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDV vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDV	FLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.78	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.10	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.39	—

Drawdowns

FDV vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum FLTW drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and FLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDV	FLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-38.00%	+34.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.79%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.79%	+11.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-8.40%	+7.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDV	FLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.29%	30.16%	-15.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.29%	23.59%	-9.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.29%	22.35%	-8.06%

FDV vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDV vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than FLTW's 1.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	1.70%	2.51%	1.89%	2.85%	3.16%	2.31%	2.14%	3.00%	1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDV and FLTW in my portfolio?

FDV and FLTW have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDV or FLTW?

On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDV or FLTW?

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDV or FLTW?

FLTW has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.56% for FDV.

What is the main difference between FDV and FLTW?

FDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FLTW is Taiwan Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.19% for FLTW.