FDV vs. EWT
FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index. FDV is actively managed, while EWT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.
Performance
FDV vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDV
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWT
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 65.65%
- 6M
- 68.38%
- 1Y
- 99.48%
- 3Y*
- 39.48%
- 5Y*
- 19.11%
- 10Y*
- 20.43%
FDV vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.36% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 11.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and EWT is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026 | -0.65 |
FDV vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDV
EWT
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FDV
EWT
Utilities
FDV
EWT
-
Healthcare
FDV
EWT
Consumer Defensive
FDV
EWT
Technology
FDV
EWT
Real Estate
FDV
EWT
-
Energy
FDV
EWT
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDV
EWT
Industrials
FDV
EWT
Communication Services
FDV
EWT
Basic Materials
FDV
EWT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EWT
FDV vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDV | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.58 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 27.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDV vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -64.37% | +61.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -5.64% | +3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -19.13% | +18.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility
FDV vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 27.85% | -15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 23.16% | -10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 21.80% | -9.35% |
FDV vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDV vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than EWT's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.68% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 12.01% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDV and EWT have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.
EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.27% for FDV.
FDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.59% for EWT.
Find the right allocation for FDV and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer