FDTZX vs. SHXPX
FDTZX (Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M) and SHXPX (American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FDTZX charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for SHXPX.
Performance
FDTZX vs. SHXPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDTZX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 30.40%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
SHXPX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDTZX vs. SHXPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDTZX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M | 0.04% |
SHXPX American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTZX and SHXPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDTZX vs. SHXPX — Risk / Return Rank
FDTZX
SHXPX
FDTZX vs. SHXPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund (SHXPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTZX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTZX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 23.86 | -23.35 |
Drawdowns
FDTZX vs. SHXPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTZX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than SHXPX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTZX and SHXPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTZX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.26% | 0.00% | -58.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | 0.00% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.61% | 0.00% | -8.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | — | — |
Volatility
FDTZX vs. SHXPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDTZX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 2.38% | +10.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 2.38% | +15.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 2.38% | +16.49% |
FDTZX vs. SHXPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTZX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SHXPX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDTZX vs. SHXPX - Dividend Comparison
FDTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.08%, while SHXPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTZX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M | 10.08% | 11.04% | 9.30% | 4.11% | 5.35% | 5.32% | 4.07% | 7.18% | 15.77% | 5.66% | 2.35% | 5.37% |
SHXPX American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FDTZX and SHXPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for FDTZX and SHXPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer