FDTZX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FDTZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 12, 2005. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FDTZX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDTZX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTZX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M | -5.18% | 26.82% | 26.26% | 23.23% | -8.72% | 24.45% | 8.28% | 30.31% | -9.87% | 16.34% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTZX achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDTZX having a 13.89% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 14.05%.
FDTZX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDTZX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTZX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDTZX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FDTZX
VOO
FDTZX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTZX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.98 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 1.50 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.53 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 7.29 | +0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTZX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.98 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.70 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.78 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.83 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTZX and VOO is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDTZX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FDTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.65%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTZX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M | 11.65% | 11.04% | 9.30% | 4.11% | 5.35% | 5.32% | 4.07% | 7.18% | 15.77% | 5.66% | 2.35% | 5.37% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FDTZX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTZX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTZX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTZX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.26% | -33.99% | -24.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -11.98% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | -24.52% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.66% | -33.99% | -2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.71% | -6.29% | -3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -3.72% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.52% | +0.20% |
Volatility
FDTZX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) is 4.49%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FDTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDTZX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 5.29% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 9.44% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 18.10% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 16.82% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 17.99% | +0.86% |