FDTZX vs. FDETX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX).
FDTZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 12, 2005. FDETX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 30, 1985.
Performance
FDTZX vs. FDETX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDTZX vs. FDETX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTZX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M | -5.18% | 26.82% | 26.26% | 23.23% | -8.72% | 24.45% | 8.28% | 30.31% | -9.87% | 16.34% |
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | -5.03% | 27.60% | 27.07% | 24.20% | -8.00% | 25.32% | 9.12% | 31.39% | -9.09% | 16.45% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDTZX having a -5.18% return and FDETX slightly higher at -5.03%. Over the past 10 years, FDTZX has underperformed FDETX with an annualized return of 13.89%, while FDETX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.
FDTZX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
FDETX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -5.03%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 14.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDTZX vs. FDETX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTZX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FDETX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDTZX vs. FDETX — Risk / Return Rank
FDTZX
FDETX
FDTZX vs. FDETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTZX | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 1.90 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.78 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 8.19 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTZX | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.83 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.78 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.62 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTZX and FDETX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDTZX vs. FDETX - Dividend Comparison
FDTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.65%, more than FDETX's 10.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTZX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M | 11.65% | 11.04% | 9.30% | 4.11% | 5.35% | 5.32% | 4.07% | 7.18% | 15.77% | 5.66% | 2.35% | 5.37% |
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | 10.89% | 10.34% | 8.95% | 4.39% | 5.66% | 5.63% | 4.47% | 7.46% | 15.81% | 5.34% | 2.92% | 5.97% |
Drawdowns
FDTZX vs. FDETX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTZX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, smaller than the maximum FDETX drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTZX and FDETX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTZX | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.26% | -66.86% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -12.42% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | -21.72% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.66% | -36.61% | -0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.71% | -9.64% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -11.26% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.70% | +0.02% |
Volatility
FDTZX vs. FDETX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDTZX | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 4.48% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 9.55% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 18.39% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 17.56% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 18.82% | +0.03% |