FDTZX vs. AVERX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX).

FDTZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 12, 2005. AVERX is a passively managed fund by Schwartz Investment Counsel that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Index. It was launched on Jan 1, 1984.

Performance

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDTZX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M	-2.10%	31.30%
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund	19.97%	0.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTZX achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 19.97% return.

FDTZX

• 1D: 3.24%
• 1M: -5.29%
• YTD: -2.10%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 26.73%
• 3Y*: 21.98%
• 5Y*: 14.18%
• 10Y*: 14.25%

AVERX

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -6.66%
• YTD: 19.97%
• 6M: 18.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTZX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.

FDTZX

Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M

AVERX

Ave Maria Value Focused Fund

Return for Risk

FDTZX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTZX

FDTZX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FDTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FDTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FDTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FDTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FDTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDTZX	AVERX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.07	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDTZX	AVERX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	1.17	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between FDTZX and AVERX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison

FDTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, more than AVERX's 0.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDTZX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M	11.28%	11.04%	9.30%	4.11%	5.35%	5.32%	4.07%	7.18%	15.77%	5.66%	2.35%	5.37%
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund	0.34%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTZX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -11.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTZX and AVERX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDTZX	AVERX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.26%	-11.33%	-46.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.78%	-6.66%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.67%	-5.39%	-3.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDTZX	AVERX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.64%	19.13%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.69%	19.13%	-1.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	19.13%	-0.25%