PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTZX vs. AVERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTZX achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 17.13% return.


FDTZX

1D
-0.29%
1M
3.20%
YTD
9.55%
6M
11.52%
1Y
30.40%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
15.06%

AVERX

1D
0.60%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
17.13%
6M
16.12%
1Y
16.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FDTZX and AVERX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTZX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTZX
FDTZX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AVERX
AVERX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AVERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVERX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
AVERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVERX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTZXAVERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.17

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.72

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

4.09

+10.56

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the AVERX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTZX and AVERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTZXAVERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

0.93

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.85

-0.34

Drawdowns

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTZX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -11.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTZX and AVERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTZXAVERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.26%

-11.33%

-46.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-10.27%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-8.88%

+8.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-5.73%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

4.32%

-2.19%

Volatility

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M (FDTZX) is 2.94%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that FDTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTZXAVERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

4.32%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

14.70%

-5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

19.00%

-6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.67%

18.86%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

18.86%

+0.01%

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTZX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTZX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison

FDTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.08%, more than AVERX's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
0.35%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDTZX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class M
10.08%11.04%9.30%4.11%5.35%5.32%4.07%7.18%15.77%5.66%2.35%5.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTZX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVERX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FDTZX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTZX dropped -58.26% vs AVERX's -11.33%.

FDTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTZX and AVERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer