FDTX vs. FDIF
FDTX (Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF) and FDIF (Fidelity Disruptors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDTX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FDIF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FDTX returned 60.66% vs 22.85% for FDIF. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
FDTX vs. FDIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTX achieves a 42.39% return, which is significantly higher than FDIF's 10.12% return.
FDTX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 23.09%
- YTD
- 42.39%
- 6M
- 42.32%
- 1Y
- 60.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIF
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.86%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDTX vs. FDIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTX Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF | 42.39% | 15.25% | 23.99% | 11.06% |
FDIF Fidelity Disruptors ETF | 10.12% | 13.83% | 19.74% | 6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTX and FDIF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FDTX and FDIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDTX vs. FDIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDTX
FDIF
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FDTX
FDIF
Communication Services
FDTX
FDIF
Consumer Cyclical
FDTX
FDIF
Basic Materials
FDTX
-
FDIF
-
Consumer Defensive
FDTX
-
FDIF
-
Energy
FDTX
-
FDIF
-
Financial Services
FDTX
-
FDIF
Healthcare
FDTX
-
FDIF
Industrials
FDTX
-
FDIF
Real Estate
FDTX
-
FDIF
Utilities
FDTX
-
FDIF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDTX vs. FDIF — Risk / Return Rank
FDTX
FDIF
FDTX vs. FDIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTX | FDIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.24 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 1.55 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 5.86 | +4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTX | FDIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 1.35 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.93 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
FDTX vs. FDIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTX drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, which is greater than FDIF's maximum drawdown of -22.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTX and FDIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTX | FDIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.23% | -22.63% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.38% | -14.80% | -4.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.90% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -3.83% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.11% | 3.91% | +2.20% |
Volatility
FDTX vs. FDIF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) at 4.11%. This indicates that FDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDTX | FDIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 4.11% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.47% | 13.37% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 17.02% | +7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 18.59% | +6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 18.59% | +6.93% |
FDTX vs. FDIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FDTX and FDIF have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
FDTX vs. FDIF - Dividend Comparison
FDTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIF Fidelity Disruptors ETF | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.35% | 0.21% |
FDTX Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FDTX and FDIF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDTX has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to FDIF (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTX dropped -27.23% vs FDIF's -22.63%.
On 1-year performance, FDTX leads with 60.66% vs 22.85% for FDIF. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, FDIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDTX has performed better with a 60.66% return vs 22.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDTX and FDIF have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
FDIF has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for FDTX.
FDTX is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDIF is Large Cap Growth Equities.
FDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDTX and FDIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer