PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTX vs. FDIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTX vs. FDIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTX achieves a 42.39% return, which is significantly higher than FDIF's 10.12% return.


FDTX

1D
-0.55%
1M
23.09%
YTD
42.39%
6M
42.32%
1Y
60.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDIF

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.86%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.33%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTX vs. FDIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FDTX
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF
42.39%15.25%23.99%11.06%
FDIF
Fidelity Disruptors ETF
10.12%13.83%19.74%6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTX and FDIF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023

0.91

The correlation between FDTX and FDIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDTX vs. FDIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDTX
FDIF

Technology

82.7%
38.5%

Communication Services

8.7%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
6.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

17.8%

Industrials

-

12.0%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FDTX
82.7%
FDIF
38.5%

Communication Services

FDTX
8.7%
FDIF
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDTX
8.6%
FDIF
6.1%

Basic Materials

FDTX

-

FDIF

-

Consumer Defensive

FDTX

-

FDIF

-

Energy

FDTX

-

FDIF

-

Financial Services

FDTX

-

FDIF
11.8%

Healthcare

FDTX

-

FDIF
17.8%

Industrials

FDTX

-

FDIF
12.0%

Real Estate

FDTX

-

FDIF
0.1%

Utilities

FDTX

-

FDIF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTX vs. FDIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTX
FDTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIF
FDIF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FDIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIF Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTX vs. FDIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTXFDIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.24

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.55

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

5.86

+4.10

FDTX vs. FDIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the FDIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTX and FDIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTXFDIFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.35

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.93

+0.32

Drawdowns

FDTX vs. FDIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTX drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, which is greater than FDIF's maximum drawdown of -22.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTX and FDIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTXFDIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.23%

-22.63%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.38%

-14.80%

-4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.90%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-3.83%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

3.91%

+2.20%

Volatility

FDTX vs. FDIF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) at 4.11%. This indicates that FDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTXFDIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

4.11%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.47%

13.37%

+6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.46%

17.02%

+7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.52%

18.59%

+6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.52%

18.59%

+6.93%

FDTX vs. FDIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FDTX and FDIF have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

FDTX vs. FDIF - Dividend Comparison

FDTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FDIF
Fidelity Disruptors ETF
0.30%0.36%0.35%0.21%
FDTX
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FDTX and FDIF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDTX has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to FDIF (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTX dropped -27.23% vs FDIF's -22.63%.

On 1-year performance, FDTX leads with 60.66% vs 22.85% for FDIF. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, FDIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDTX has performed better with a 60.66% return vs 22.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDTX and FDIF have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

FDIF has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for FDTX.

FDTX is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDIF is Large Cap Growth Equities.

FDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTX and FDIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer