PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTS vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTS vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -31.56% return.


FDTS

1D
1.79%
1M
-3.48%
6M
10.21%
YTD
14.65%
1Y
32.52%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
10.23%

SMST

1D
-1.67%
1M
37.17%
6M
-24.18%
YTD
-31.56%
1Y
223.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTS vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FDTS and SMST is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTS vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTS vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTSSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.39

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.48

4.64

+2.84

FDTS vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTS and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDTS vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTSSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-99.25%

+47.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-85.39%

+72.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-97.31%

+89.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-90.88%

+80.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

43.98%

-39.69%

Volatility

FDTS vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) is 7.43%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.47%. This indicates that FDTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTSSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

56.47%

-49.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

135.94%

-119.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.64%

149.09%

-130.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.47%

167.87%

-138.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.82%

167.87%

-143.05%

FDTS vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTS vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.84%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTS and SMST have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (56.47%) compared to FDTS (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 223.04% vs 32.52% for FDTS. On fees, FDTS is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FDTS has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 223.04% return vs 32.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDTS is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

FDTS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 1.29% for SMST.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTS and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer