FDTS vs. LRCU
FDTS (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDTS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. FDTS is passively managed, while LRCU is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDTS charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.
Performance
FDTS vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 268.21% return.
FDTS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 20.77%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
LRCU
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 57.23%
- YTD
- 268.21%
- 6M
- 315.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDTS vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 18.78% | 11.20% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 268.21% | 172.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTS and LRCU is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDTS vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank
FDTS
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDTS vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDTS | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDTS vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and LRCU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTS | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.26% | -40.09% | -11.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | 0.00% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -9.34% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | — | — |
Volatility
FDTS vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDTS | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 113.97% | -95.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 113.97% | -84.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 113.97% | -89.05% |
FDTS vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDTS vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison
FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 2.53% | 2.94% | 3.94% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 3.01% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.78% | 1.73% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDTS and LRCU have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDTS is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDTS is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
FDTS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 1.30% for LRCU.
Find the right allocation for FDTS and LRCU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer