FDTS vs. CGV
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV).
FDTS and CGV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDTS is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index. It was launched on Feb 15, 2012. CGV is an actively managed fund by Conductor Fund. It was launched on Apr 19, 2016.
Performance
FDTS vs. CGV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDTS vs. CGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 11.04% | 51.17% | 2.44% | 10.96% | -5.21% |
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF | 6.16% | 23.11% | -3.34% | 5.72% | 3.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly higher than CGV's 6.16% return.
FDTS
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -9.63%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 6M
- 16.94%
- 1Y
- 59.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
CGV
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -8.21%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 30.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDTS vs. CGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than CGV's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDTS vs. CGV — Risk / Return Rank
FDTS
CGV
FDTS vs. CGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTS | CGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.16 | 1.90 | +1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.90 | 2.54 | +1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.39 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 2.49 | +2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.83 | 9.59 | +9.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTS | CGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16 | 1.90 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.69 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTS and CGV is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDTS vs. CGV - Dividend Comparison
FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than CGV's 5.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 2.71% | 2.94% | 3.94% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 3.01% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.78% | 1.73% |
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF | 5.17% | 4.58% | 2.87% | 4.56% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDTS vs. CGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than CGV's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and CGV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTS | CGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.26% | -16.64% | -34.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -12.13% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.95% | -8.21% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -3.67% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.15% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FDTS vs. CGV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) at 6.94%. This indicates that FDTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDTS | CGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 6.94% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.60% | 10.88% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 16.21% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 13.39% | +15.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 13.39% | +11.36% |