CGV vs. FNDC
Compare and contrast key facts about Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC).
CGV and FNDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGV is an actively managed fund by Conductor Fund. It was launched on Apr 19, 2016. FNDC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Performance
CGV vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGV vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF | 7.76% | 23.11% | -3.34% | 5.72% | 3.44% |
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 5.54% | 35.65% | 1.38% | 14.92% | -1.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGV achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than FNDC's 5.54% return.
CGV
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 32.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDC
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGV vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGV has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGV vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank
CGV
FNDC
CGV vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGV | FNDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 2.19 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 2.99 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.44 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 3.13 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | 12.02 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGV | FNDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.19 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.48 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGV and FNDC is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CGV vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison
CGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than FNDC's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF | 5.09% | 4.58% | 2.87% | 4.56% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 3.66% | 3.86% | 3.59% | 2.86% | 1.98% | 2.58% | 1.77% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 1.94% | 1.95% | 1.30% |
Drawdowns
CGV vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGV drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum FNDC drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGV and FNDC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGV | FNDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.64% | -43.22% | +26.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -11.20% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -6.95% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -8.53% | +4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.91% | +0.27% |
Volatility
CGV vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) is 6.10%, while Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that CGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGV | FNDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 6.60% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 10.39% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 15.88% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 15.83% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 16.72% | -3.31% |