FDTS vs. BEPC
FDTS (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index, while BEPC (Brookfield Renewable Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, FDTS returned 44.72% vs 17.48% for BEPC. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FDTS vs. BEPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly higher than BEPC's -3.02% return.
FDTS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 20.77%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
BEPC
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- -3.02%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDTS vs. BEPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 18.78% | 51.17% | -0.03% |
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation | -3.02% | 45.18% | -2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTS and BEPC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDTS vs. BEPC — Risk / Return Rank
FDTS
BEPC
FDTS vs. BEPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDTS | BEPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.12 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 0.92 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.78 | 2.16 | +9.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDTS vs. BEPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than BEPC's maximum drawdown of -19.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and BEPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTS | BEPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.26% | -19.92% | -31.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -19.92% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -16.16% | +11.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -6.36% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 8.48% | -4.82% |
Volatility
FDTS vs. BEPC - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) have volatilities of 8.44% and 8.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDTS | BEPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.44% | 8.63% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 26.73% | -11.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 33.73% | -15.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 35.32% | -5.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 35.32% | -10.40% |
Dividends
FDTS vs. BEPC - Dividend Comparison
FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than BEPC's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation | 4.19% | 3.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 2.53% | 2.94% | 3.94% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 3.01% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.78% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDTS and BEPC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEPC has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to FDTS (8.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs BEPC's -19.92%.
FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDTS and BEPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer